Emails Sent By Mark Hurd's Accuser Jodie Fisher Have Leaked (HPQ, ORCL)
Emails Sent By Mark Hurd's Accuser Jodie Fisher Have Leaked (HPQ, ORCL)
Some of the emails exchanged by ex-HP CEO Mark Hurd and the woman who accused him of sexual harassment, Jodie Fisher, have been leaked. The New York Times posted the emails, and we've uploaded them to Scribd and embedded them here. Nothing in these emails seems to contradict what was said in the letter Gloria Allred sent to HP's board. For the most part, it's just snippets of Fisher sending along short messages saying she's happy to be working for HP. (The fact that a random event hostess was emailing with the CEO seems pretty crazy to us.) Also, as you read these, don't forget, this is a hand picked selection of emails from HP. We're not seeing everything here, just what it wants us to see. Hurd Emails // Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.Join the conversation about this story »See Also:Well, There's No Longer Any Mystery Why HP Fired Mark HurdThis Is The Letter That Got Mark Hurd Fired As CEO Of HPThe Scandalous Letter That Led To Mark Hurd Being Fired At HP Will Finally Become Public
Facebook Holds Secret Banker/Analyst Meeting To Kick Off IPO
Facebook Holds Secret Banker/Analyst Meeting To Kick Off IPO
Facebook is hosting a meeting with bankers, analysts, and lawyers today, Kayla Tausche at CNBC reports. This is usually a "kick-off meeting" to get the IPO started. Bankers can ask questions so they can go sell the Facebook IPO to investors. Tausche called it, "run of the mill". However, one thing that's not "run of the mill" is having bankers and analysts at the same meeting. After the first dot-com bust, banks were forced to build firewalls to prevent the banking team from influencing the research team. Facebook wanted to save time by having both bankers and analysts come to a town hall meeting where they could gab with the C-level executives of Facebook. If bankers want to talk to the research people, they have to do it through lawyers says Tausche.
Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.Join the conversation about this story »See Also:YAHOO SUES FACEBOOKThese Are The Patents Yahoo Claims Facebook Is InfringingMicrosoft Can -- And SHOULD -- Save Facebook From This Lame Yahoo Patent Suit
Twitter's Anti-Patent Pledge Is Bogus Fluff
Twitter's Anti-Patent Pledge Is Bogus Fluff
Yesterday, Twitter published a pledge that it would only use patents for "defensive" purposes, and a lot of folks in the tech industry are lining up in support. Yammer CEO David Sacks, who is so angry about Yahoo's patent lawsuit against Facebook that he offered a $25,000 signing bonus to fleeing Yahoo employees, has promised to support the agreement via Twitter. VC Fred Wilson said that Union Square Ventures is "committed" to supporting it. Startup accelerator TechStars said it would incorporate it into the standard formation documents for all its startups, although founders are free to ignore it. Despite all the congratulations going on, the pledge actually doesn't mean much. As Michael Kanellos pointed out on Forbes yesterday, the agreement has holes. For instance, Twitter's pledge doesn't apply to any company that's filed its own patent infringement suit in the last 10 years. So even if you're a real company making real products, and you filed a lawsuit to prevent somebody from blatantly ripping off your IP, Twitter reserves the right to sue you first. Another example: the pledge says that Twitter can use the patents offensively to "deter a patent litigation threat." So if Twitter feels threatened, it can sue. Twitter's pledge also gives employees -- the actual inventors -- an uncomfortable amount of power. Kanellos lays out a hypothetical situation in which a rip-off company clones Twitter, then bribes a key patent holder to withhold consent so Twitter can't sue. Geekwire interviewed three IP experts who agreed that the pledge is full of loopholes. One of them called it "both dumb and disingenuous." Among other problems: you can't use patents defensively against most trolls, because they don't make any product. By definition they can't possibly violate your patents. You can really only use patents "defensively" when another company sues you, or threatens to do so. So what's this really about? This is about Twitter trying to portray itself as an innovative good guy in a world full of big, slow competitors. Think Yahoo. Or Microsoft. That's fine marketing -- it may even be true -- but it's not a serious attempt to fix the patent system and shouldn't be regarded as such. Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.Join the conversation about this story »FACEBOOK FIRES BACK: Sues Yahoo Over 10 Of Its Own Patents (YHOO)
FACEBOOK FIRES BACK: Sues Yahoo Over 10 Of Its Own Patents (YHOO)
Facebook is turning the tables on Yahoo. It is suing Yahoo, claiming patent infringement on 10 different patents. This is in response to Yahoo's lawsuit against Facebook, which says Facebook is infringing on a dozen patents. Facebook wants to have the lawsuit dropped, and it's firing back to with patents it developed on its own, as well as purchased from outside companies. In the suit, Facebook says all of Yahoo's major properties are infringing on Facebook patents. Specifically, it says Flickr is infringing on Yahoo patents, as well as Yahoo's optimization engine for its pages. We have the suit below, and the patent infringement claims start on page 12. Click here to see a quick run down of all the patents Facebook says Yahoo infringed > Fb Answer and Counterclaims Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.Join the conversation about this story »See Also:Yahoo Is So Bloated, It Could Cut 25 Percent Of Its Staff And Nobody Would NoticeTHE MICROSOFT INVESTOR: Could Bing Help Facebook Steal Ad Dollars Away From Google?THE GOOGLE INVESTOR: Patents, Patents, Patents! Oracle And Now ... Lycos?